|
Dear
Health
Freedom Advocate,
The
latest
news on the ANZTPA (ANZ Therapeutic Products Authority) is that the NZ
Parliament committee will not recommend that NZ be party to the scheme.
This
sounds like a great win for the Kiwi's however I would not be surprised if
the
Health Minister, Annette King, still tries to push the Bill through
without any
regard to the committee findings.
Those of
you
who are not up with this issue, the Australian TGA is trying to take over
regulation of the New Zealand natural health industry. This will increase
regulation and increase costs to the consumer. Many health supplements
would
quite possibly disappear from the shelf because they are not legal in
Australia
there fore will not be legal in NZ in the future. All in all it would
devastate
the NZ health industry, however it would be beneficial to the larger
health
supplement companies here in Australia, the same companies which are
already
owned by the pharmaceutical drug cartels, companies like Natures Own,
Golden
Glow, Natures Way, Heron to name a few.
The end
point
of the ANZTPA is to bring NZ and Australia closer towards international
harmonisation and Codex in the many years ahead.
NZ dumps ANZTPA, talks of split
Posted 18 June 2007
http://www.pharmainfocus.com.au/news.asp?newsid=1780
The New Zealand parliamentary select committee directed to report on the
ANZ
Therapeutic Products Authority (TPA) bill has split and will not recommend
the
scheme be passed by the NZ Parliament.
After nearly six months of deliberation on the Therapeutic Products and
Medicines Bill, the Government Administration Committee has said, "We
have been
unable to reach agreement and therefore cannot recommend that the bill be
passed."
Without passage of the bill in NZ, the joint scheme cannot go ahead.
Leader of the United Future Party Peter Dunne and NZ Foreign Minister
Winston
Peters immediately came out against the legislation in its current
form.
The committee split along party lines with Labour members favouring the
bill
with minor changes while National Party members called for complementary
medicines to be quarantined in a "lighter" NZ-based regulatory
scheme. The
non-voting Green Party member also supported stand-alone NZ regulation of
complementaries.
The committee said it had received 895 written submissions on the bill.
"Over
three quarters of these submissions were from individuals and the
remainder from
various organisations and groups. Most individual submitters were
consumers of
dietary supplements and natural health products and generally opposed the
joint
regulation of therapeutic products. Recurring concerns were that the costs
and
other consequences of complying with the new regulations could reduce
choice for
the consumer, that the products remaining on the market might become more
expensive, the new Authority might undermine New Zealand's sovereignty,
and that
small and innovative New Zealand-based businesses might be adversely
affected,"
the report said.
Industry submissions generally supported the intent of the bill although
changes
to specific provisions were called for.
"A number of supporters also argued that the bill would be beneficial
to public
health by making medicines available sooner, by facilitating access to
medicines
used to treat rare diseases, and by bringing New Zealand's regulation of
therapeutic products into line with international best practice by
establishing
a joint Authority," the committee report said.
Peters, who leads the NZ First party, proposed NZ companies should be able
to
opt out of the scheme and be regulated locally while Dunne - who is an
Associate
Minister for Health - said "we will not support the legislation any
further,
unless natural health products, and complementary medicines are excluded
from
the legislation, and made subject to local regulation, with the right to
opt in
to the joint arrangement if manufacturers so wished, and with no change to
existing rules on direct to consumer advertising".
Michael
Bending
Alliance for Health Freedom Australia
http://www.ahf-au.org
'All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do
nothing'
- Edmund Burke (1729-1797), British writer and politician -
|